EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The 2008 Annual Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic
and Security Review Commission sets forth the Commission's analysis of the
U.S.-China relationship in the topical areas designated by the
Commission's Congressional mandate: the areas for the Commission to
consider and about which it is to make recommendations to the Congress.
These include China's proliferation practices, the qualitative and
quantitative nature of economic transfers of U.S. production activities to
China, the effect of China's development on world energy supplies, the
access to and use of U.S. capital markets by China, China's regional
economic and security impacts, U.S.-China bilateral programs and
agreements, China's compliance with its accession agreement to the World
Trade Organization (WTO), and the implications of China's restrictions on
freedom of expression. Our analysis, along with recommendations to the
Congress for addressing identified concerns, is chronicled in the Report
and summarized herein.
COMMISSION ASSESSMENT OF U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY
RELATIONS
Congress gave the Commission the mission of evaluating ''the
national security implications of the bilateral trade and economic
relationship between the United States and the People's Republic of
China'' and reporting its evaluation to Congress annually together with
its findings concerning the topical areas listed above. The Commission
adopts a broad interpretation of ''national security'' in making its
review and its evaluation of how the U.S.-China relationship affects the
economic health and industrial base of the United States, the military and
proliferation risks China poses to the United States, and the threat to
U.S. economic and security interests and influence in Asia.
As in its previous five Annual Reports, the Commission sees
progress on some issues but the continuation of a number of troubling
trends. The Commission also notes that it continues to stand behind both
its conclusions as enunciated in the previous Reports to Congress-unless
it specifies in this Report that a circumstance and therefore the
Commission's conclusion regarding a particular issue has changed-and its
recommendations to Congress contained in those Reports, and it does not
routinely repeat either its conclusions or recommendations from prior
Reports.
COMMISSION CONCLUSIONS
The Report presents its conclusions, analyses, and
recommendations to Congress in 17 segments organized in six chapters.
However, the Commission has attempted to take an integrated approach to
its assessments, believing that economic, security, and other issues are
interrelated. The intersections of U.S. geopolitical, economic, security,
diplomatic, and cultural interests form a complex web of concerns that are
connected to the overall relationship between the United States of America
and the People's Republic of China.
The Commission's conclusions are included in this Executive
Summary. At the end of this summary, the Commission's 10 key
recommendations are listed. The Commission makes a total of 45
recommendations to the Congress in this Report. Those pertaining to each
of the six Report chapters appear at the conclusion of the chapter, and a
comprehensive list is provided beginning on page
337.
The U.S.-China Trade and Economic Relationship
China held to its hybrid model of a state-directed economic
system throughout 2008 as it consolidated its position as one of the
world's fastest-growing countries. Alone among the world's major
economies, China refuses to allow the renminbi (RMB), its currency, to
respond to free market movements. China's leaders instead keep the
currency trading at an artificially low level in order to suppress export
prices-a deliberate violation of the rules of the International Monetary
Fund, of which it is a member. As a result of this and other factors,
China's current account surplus with the United States and the rest of the
world soared and added to China's record foreign exchange reserves of
nearly $2 trillion when this Report was completed, up from $1.43 trillion
at the publication of the Commission's Report a year ago. China began
employing this foreign exchange in new ways. Rather than using it to
improve the standard of living for the Chinese people through education,
health care, or pension systems, China began investing the money through
new overseas investment vehicles, including an official sovereign wealth
fund, the China Investment Corporation. Despite statements by Chinese
leaders that they seek only financial gain from diversifying their
investments into equity stakes in western companies, there are increasing
suspicions that China intends to use its cash to gain political advantage
globally and to lock up supplies of scarce resources around the world.
Other Chinese government economic policies harmed the United
States, China's trading partners, and its own citizens. China made scant
progress in reining in the rampant counterfeiting and piracy that deprive
legitimate foreign businesses operating in China of their intellectual
property, while they provide an effective subsidy to Chinese companies
that make use of stolen software and other advanced technology. Chinese
regulators failed to prevent the domestic sale and export of consumer
goods tainted with industrial chemicals and fraudulent ingredients. In one
case examined by the Commission, China's lax controls on the production
and handling of its seafood exports led to a partial U.S. ban for health
reasons on imported Chinese seafood. Yet, thanks to artificially low
prices partly resulting from an array of subsidies to its seafood
industry, China has become the largest exporter of seafood to the United
States.
Conclusions:
The U.S.-China Trade and Economic Relationship's Current
Status and Significant Changes During 2008
China's trade surplus with the United States remains large, despite
the global economic slowdown. The U.S. trade deficit in goods with China
through August 2008 was $167.7 billion, which represents an increase of
2.4 percent over the same period in 2007. Since China joined the WTO in
2001, the United States has accumulated a $1.16 trillion goods deficit
with China and, as a result of the persistent trade imbalance, by August
2008 China had accumulated nearly $2 trillion in foreign currency
reserves. China's trade relationship with the United States continues to
be severely unbalanced.
The U.S. current account deficit causes considerable anxiety among
both economists and foreign investors who worry that future taxpayer will
find it increasingly difficult to meet both principal and interest
payments on such a large debt. The total debt burden already is having a
significant impact on economic growth, which will only increase in
severity.
China's currency has strengthened against the U.S. dollar by more
than 18.5 percent since the government announced in July 2005 it was
transitioning from a hard peg to the dollar to a ''managed float.''
Starting in July 2008, however, the rate of the RMB's appreciation has
slowed, and there are some indications this may be due to the Chinese
government's fear that a strong RMB will damage China's exports. China's
RMB remains significantly undervalued.
China continues to violate its WTO commitments to avoid
trade-distorting measures. Among the trade-related situations in China
that are counter to those commitments are restricted market access for
foreign financial news services, books, films and other media; weak
intellectual property protection; sustained use of domestic and export
subsidies; lack of transparency in regulatory processes; continued
emphasis on implementing policies that protect and promote domestic
industries to the disadvantage of foreign competition; import barriers and
export preferences; and limitations on foreign investment or ownership in
certain sectors of the economy.
Over the past year, China has adopted a battery of new laws and
policies that may restrict foreign access to China's markets and protect
and assist domestic producers. These measures include new antimonopoly and
patent laws and increased tax rebates to textile manufacturers. The full
impact of these laws is not yet known, particularly whether they will help
or hinder fair trade and investment.
In 2008, China emerged as a stronger power within the WTO as it
took a more assertive role in the Doha Round of multilateral trade talks,
working with India and other less-developed nations to insist on
protection for subsistence farmers.
China's Capital Investment Vehicles and Implications for the
U.S. Economy and National Security
The significant expansion of the Chinese government's involvement
in the international economy in general and in the U.S. economy in
particular has concerned many economists and government officials due to
uncertainty about the Chinese government's and the Chinese Communist
Party's motivations, strategies, and possible impacts on market stability
and national security. At the same time, cash-strapped U.S. firms have
welcomed the investments, viewing them as stable and secure sources of
financing in the wake of the credit crunch.
China's government uses a number of state-controlled investment
vehicles among which it chooses depending on its particular investment
purposes and strategies; most widely known among such vehicles are China
Investment Corporation (CIC), the State Administration for Foreign
Exchange (SAFE), and China International Trust and Investment Corporation
(CITIC).
Some aspects of China Investment Corporation's mandate follow
China's industrial policy planning and promotion of domestic industries
by, for example, investing in natural resources and emerging markets that
are relevant for the advancement of China's value-added industries. CIC
and SAFE form just one part of a complex web of state-owned banks,
state-owned companies and industries, and pension funds, all of which
receive financing and instructions from the central government, promote a
state-led development agenda, and have varying levels of transparency.
Many of their investment activities contravene official assurances that
they are not being managed to wield political influence.
Regulations governing investments by sovereign wealth funds,
especially disclosure requirements pertaining to their transactions and
ownership stakes, are still in development, both in the multilateral arena
and in the United States. There is concern that the Chinese government can
hide its ownership of U.S. companies by using stakes in private equity
vehicles like hedge or investment funds.
China's foreign exchange reserves continue to grow, while its
management of the exchange rate has given it monopoly control on outward
flows of investment. This strongly suggests that China will have a very
substantial and long-term presence in the U.S. economy through equity
stakes; loans; mergers and acquisitions; ownership of land, factories, and
companies; and other forms of investment.
Research and Development, Technological Advances in Some Key
Industries, and Changing Trade Flows with China
China has been pursuing a government policy designed to make China
a technology superpower and to enhance its exports. Some of its tactics
violate free market principles-specifically its use of subsidies and an
artificially low RMB value to attract foreign investment.
Foreign technology companies, such as U.S. and European computer,
aerospace, and automotive firms, have invested heavily in research and
development and production facilities in China, sharing or losing
technology and other know-how. Chinese manufacturers have benefitted from
this investment.
The U.S. government has not established any effective policies or
mechanisms at the federal level to retain research and development
facilities within its borders.
China's trade surplus in advanced technology products is growing
rapidly, while the United States is running an ever-larger deficit in
technology trade. China also is pursuing a strategy of creating an
integrated technology sector to reduce its dependence on manufacturing
inputs.
China seeks to become a global power in aerospace and join the
United States and Europe in producing large passenger aircraft. China also
seeks to join the United States, Germany, and Japan as major global
automobile producers. So far as China competes fairly with other nations,
this need not be a concern. But China's penchant for using currency
manipulation, industrial subsidies, and intellectual property theft to
gain an advantage violates international norms.
A Case Study of the Local Impact of Trade with China: Seafood
Imports from China into Louisiana and the U.S. Gulf Coast, and Related
Safety Issues
Many fish imports from Chinese aquaculture pose a health risk
because of the unsanitary conditions of some Chinese fish farms, including
water polluted by untreated sewage; fish contaminated by bacteria,
viruses, and parasites; and fish treated with antibiotics and other
veterinary medicines that are banned in the United States as dangerous to
human health.
Since 2001, China has become the world's dominant seafood exporter,
due in large part to the government's promotion of industrial fish farming
and the application of extensive government subsidies to the industry,
including cheap fuel, outright construction grants, and free use of
reservoirs and rivers.
China is building an industrialized aquaculture sector through the
use of extensive subsidies. In addition to producing food for domestic
consumption, China has succeeded in creating a large aquaculture export
industry as part of the government's overall industrial policy. As a
result, China now is the largest volume exporter of fish to the United
States, shipping more than one billion pounds annually, or one in five
pounds of seafood eaten by Americans.
Import-sensitive seafood product lines in the Gulf of Mexico region
of the United States, such as shrimp, crawfish, and catfish, have suffered
significant declines as a result of Chinese imports. Predicted long-term
trends for the Gulf seafood industry are for flat or lower sales.
Antidumping penalties imposed by the United States on Chinese
shrimp and crawfish exports sold at below market value accomplished little
of their intended effect. This appears to be due in part to transshipment
by China through ports of other Asian nations in order to avoid the
penalty tariffs and in part to the failure to collect the penalty tariffs.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with responsibility
for monitoring imports of fish, does not yet have the authority or the
personnel to inspect fish farms or processors in China nor to require and
enforce regulation of Chinese aquaculture by the Chinese government
equivalent to U.S. Department of Agriculture requirements for foreign meat
and poultry producers. The European Union, Japan, Canada, and even Hong
Kong have more rigorous inspection regimes.
The FDA lacks the authority to seize and destroy seafood shipments
it has rejected for import into the United States. In some cases, the FDA
must relinquish the fish to the shipper, which has led to a practice known
as ''port shopping'' in which importers try to bring seafood rejected at
one U.S. port through another one. The situation is exacerbated by the
fact that it takes the FDA, on average, a year to notify U.S. ports of the
potential for a banned shipment to attempt to enter at another port. The
FDA also lacks the authority to order a mandatory recall of seafood or
even to block imports of Chinese seafood at the request of Chinese
officials.
In an effort to forestall epidemic diseases due to overcrowding and
to compensate for the use of water polluted by agricultural fertilizers,
industrial wastes, and partially treated sewage, Chinese fish farmers,
acting on unscientific advice, often add chemicals and pharmaceuticals to
the water of their farms.
The challenge of assuring that Chinese-produced seafood meets
minimal quality standards is exacerbated by the fact that there is little
traceability or accountability of the products of China's 4.5 million fish
farms and one million processors, most of them small operations whose
products are aggregated by wholesalers and processors.
The current form of a memorandum of agreement addressing seafood
safety and related procedures that is being negotiated by the U.S. and
People's Republic of China governments would allow the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration to monitor the performance of various Chinese government
agencies in ensuring the safety of China's seafood exports but would not
provide the FDA with the authority to conduct its own inspections in
China.
The current Country of Origin Label regulations pertaining to
imported fish are ineffective because of the many exemptions the law
provides.
China's Activities Directly Affecting U.S.
Security Interests
China's record of proliferating weapons of mass destruction
or effect has improved in recent years, and the nation has played a
significant role in some important nonproliferation activities such as the
Six-Party Talks intended to denuclearize North Korea. However, the United
States continues to have concerns about the commitment of China's
leadership to nonproliferation and to enforcing the strengthened
nonproliferation laws and procedures the nation has established and about
China's refusal to participate in some international nonproliferation
agreements and regimes. The United States also is concerned that the
nuclear power technology China is selling to other nations may result in
nuclear proliferation.
China increasingly is devising unique interpretations of
agreements or treaties to which it is a party that have the effect of
expanding the territory over which it claims sovereignty and rationalizing
such expansions, particularly outward from its coast and upward into outer
space. This development, coupled with its military modernization, its
development of impressive but disturbing capabilities for military use of
space and cyber warfare, and its demonstrated employment of these
capabilities, suggest China is intent on expanding its sphere of control
even at the expense of its Asian neighbors and the United States and in
contravention of international consensus and formal treaties and
agreements. These tendencies quite possibly will be exacerbated by China's
growing need for natural resources to support its population and economy
that it cannot obtain domestically. The United States should watch these
trends closely and act to protect its interests where they are threatened.
Conclusions
China's Proliferation Policies and Practices
China has made progress in developing nonproliferation policies and
mechanisms to implement those policies. Although it is apparent that China
is making some meaningful efforts to establish a culture and norms
supporting some aspects of nonproliferation within its bureaucracy and
industry, gaps remain in the policies, the strength of government support
for them, and their enforcement.
Although China has acceded to numerous international agreements on
nonproliferation and has cooperated with the United States on some
nonproliferation issues (e.g., the Six-Party Talks), China has been
reluctant to participate fully in U.S.-led nonproliferation efforts such
as the Proliferation Security Initiative and in multilateral efforts to
persuade Iran to cease its uranium enrichment and other nuclear
development activities.
China's support for multilateral negotiations with North Korea can
help to reduce tensions on the Korean Peninsula, open North Korea to
dialogue, and improve bilateral relations among the countries
participating in the process-which may be crucial ingredients for peace
and cooperation in northeast Asia and beyond.
Experts have expressed concerns that China's sales or transfers of
nuclear energy technology to other nations may create conditions for
proliferation of nuclear weapons expertise, technology, and related
materials. These activities also could feed the insecurities of other
nations and cause them to pursue their own nuclear weapons development
efforts. This could lead to an increase in the number of nations
possessing nuclear weapons capability.
China's Views of Sovereignty and Methods of Controlling
Access to its Territory
China's leaders adamantly resist any activity they perceive to
interfere with China's claims to territorial sovereignty. At times this
priority conflicts with international norms and practices.
Some experts within China are attempting to assert a view that
China is entitled to sovereignty over outer space above its territory,
contrary to international practice. If this becomes Chinese policy, it
could set the stage for conflict with the United States and other nations
that expect the right of passage for their spacecraft.
China has asserted sovereignty over the seas and airspace in an
Exclusive Economic Zone that extends 200 miles from its coastal baseline.
This already has produced disputes with the United States and other
nations and brings the prospect of conflict in the future.
Any assertions by Chinese officials of sovereignty in the maritime,
air, and outer space domains are not just a bilateral issue between the
United States and China. The global economy is dependent upon the
fundamental principles of freedom of navigation of the seas and air space,
and treatment of outer space as a global ''commons'' without borders. All
nations that benefit from the use of these domains would be adversely
affected by the encroachment of Chinese sovereignty claims.
China's efforts to alter the balance of sovereignty rights are part
of its overall access control strategy and could have an impact on the
perceived legitimacy of U.S. military operations in the region, especially
in times of crisis.
China is building a legal case for its own unique interpretation of
international treaties and agreements. China is using ''lawfare'' and
other tools of national power to persuade other nations to accept China's
definition of sovereignty in the maritime, air, and space domains.
The Nature and Extent of China's Space and Cyber Activities
and their Implications for U.S. Security
China continues to make significant progress in developing space
capabilities, many of which easily translate to enhanced military
capacity. In China, the military runs the space program, and there is no
separate, distinguishable civilian program. Although some Chinese space
programs have no explicit military intent, many space systems-such as
communications, navigation, meteorological, and imagery systems-are dual
use in nature.
The People's Liberation Army currently has sufficient capability to
meet many of its space goals. Planned expansions in electronic and signals
intelligence, facilitated in part by new, space-based assets, will provide
greatly increased intelligence and targeting capability. These advances
will result in an increased threat to U.S. military assets and personnel.
China's space architecture contributes to its military's command,
control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance (C4ISR) capability. This increased capability allows China
to project its limited military power in the western and southern Pacific
Ocean and to place U.S. forces at risk sooner in any conflict.
Cyber space is a critical vulnerability of the U.S. government and
economy, since both depend heavily on the use of computers and their
connection to the Internet. The dependence on the Internet makes computers
and information stored on those computers vulnerable.
China is likely to take advantage of the U.S. dependence on cyber
space for four significant reasons. First, the costs of cyber operations
are low in comparison with traditional espionage or military activities.
Second, determining the origin of cyber operations and attributing them to
the Chinese government or any other operator is difficult. Therefore, the
United States would be hindered in responding conventionally to such an
attack. Third, cyber attacks can confuse the enemy. Fourth, there is an
underdeveloped legal framework to guide responses.
China is aggressively pursuing cyber warfare capabilities that may
provide it with an asymmetric advantage against the United States. In a
conflict situation, this advantage would reduce current U.S. conventional
military dominance.
China's Energy and Environment Policies and
Activities
China's economy, energy use, and environment are inextricably
linked. China's rapid economic growth has resulted in an increase in
energy consumption, and a reliable energy supply is needed to continue
fueling this growth. A significant portion of China's energy consumption
is supplied by coal, and with changing consumption patterns, oil and gas
also are becoming important fuel sources. This reliance upon fossil fuels,
coupled with weak environmental governance, has resulted in pollution that
affects public health, air and water quality, and the economy. This
pollution is not limited to China, as it has been found to reach the
United States. The fossil fuel reliance also has resulted in China
becoming the world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide. China is
developing a regulatory framework to address these problems, but stricter
enforcement, oversight, and industrial compliance are needed. The United
States is cooperating with China on these issues through various
agreements and programs to assist China in devising and implementing the
right incentives needed to establish effective energy and environmental
policies.
Conclusions
China's Current Energy Picture
China's total energy consumption is growing and is projected to
surpass that of the United States in 2010. By 2030, China will consume 25
percent more energy than the United States. The effects of such
consumption growth already are influencing world energy markets, the
global availability of energy resources, and the price of these resources.
Coal remains China's primary fuel source, and China's coal
consumption is expected to increase. This will increase China's already
troubling emission of pollutants, notably including carbon dioxide, and
will exacerbate the challenge of reducing China's pollution.
China's energy consumption results in environmental consequences
that have real economic and human costs. The cost of pollution has been
reported to equal 781 billion RMB ($112 billion) per year, and
pollution-related illnesses cause an estimated 750,000 deaths per year in
China. Continued declines in environmental quality potentially could
hinder the nation's economic growth and possibly lead to a challenge of
the Communist Party's authority.
The pollution produced by China's energy consumption increasingly
is reaching and harming other portions of the world, including the United
States. If current projections for China's emissions are realized and
production of these emissions is not substantially mitigated, major
international tensions may appear.
China's carbon dioxide emissions are the largest of any nation and
are projected to grow significantly. Global efforts to address climate
change must consider the impact of China's current and future emissions.
Tackling the Consequences of China's Energy Consumption
China's energy and environmental policy institutions are weak, and
without significant support and strengthening by the PRC leadership, these
institutions will be incapable of reversing the trends of China's energy
consumption and environmental pollution.
The most obvious explanation for the weakness of China's energy and
environmental institutions is the government's lack of commitment to
devote the necessary resources to achieving substantial progress in these
arenas. The government demonstrated in its preparations for the Beijing
Olympic Games that it has the ability to use governmental mechanisms to
develop and enforce environmental policies to achieve its
objectives-specifically improving the quality of Beijing's air.
Given the transboundary environmental impact of China's unbridled
energy consumption, the United States has a keen interest in supporting
China's energy and environmental bureaucracy to improve its transparency,
expertise, and capacity to promulgate and enforce regulations designed to
reduce emissions and increase energy efficiency.
Chinese leaders are aware of the need to moderate the growth of
energy consumption and to improve energy efficiency but to date they have
not made a commitment to reduce carbon dioxide emissions at the cost of
economic development.
China participates in multilateral negotiations to address climate
change but has major difficulty supporting an agreement that requires it
to reduce its net emissions. Chinese negotiating efforts attempt to shift
the burden to reduce emissions to developed, industrialized nations and to
escape being placed in this group.
As the negotiations for a post-Kyoto climate change mitigation
framework move forward, the United States and China have a joint interest
in cooperating to influence the outcome of the negotiations and to resolve
their bilateral differences in order to achieve a mutually acceptable
solution and a shared understanding of each country's commitments under
the agreement.
Without a reduction in tariffs, and effective protection for
intellectual property rights and technology, it will be very difficult for
American companies to participate in transferring energy and environmental
technologies to China.
China's Foreign Activities and Relationships
China, as all other nations, uses economic, military, and
political tools to advance its interests on the world stage. In some
cases, China's foreign relations activities support the advancement of
global peace and security, and in other cases-such as selling arms to
Sudan-they harm efforts to resolve international crises.
This chapter examines the regional economic and security
effects of China's relationships with Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan and
the ways in which its regional and global activities impact the United
States and its security interests. In April 2008, a Commission delegation
traveled to the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong, and in August
2008 a delegation traveled to South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. The meetings
during these trips with government officials, military leaders,
academicians, business leaders, U.S. diplomats, and others form the basis
for analyzing how China's role in the region is affecting and will affect
U.S. economic and security partnerships and how common interests can be
pursued.
Conclusions
China's Expanding Global Influence and its Foreign Policy
Goals and Tools
China's growing diplomatic activism is an attempt to demonstrate
that China has attained great power status. China is relying upon its
''charm offensive'' to win friends around the world, and it is using its
influence to push back potential adversaries.
China has been able to use its economic weight to create financial
dependencies that can constrain or censure the actions of other countries
that rely on China's trade. This has allowed China to expand its influence
among developed nations, namely the United States and the European Union,
and to be more assertive of its own economic interests, as was most
recently observed in its behavior at the World Trade Organization's July
2008 Doha negotiating round.
China's use of aid and investment may have detrimental consequences
for the U.S.' and international financial institutions' desire to promote
transparency, accountable governance, environmental protection, and human
development in the developing world.
China has continued to transfer weapons and military technology to
nations that may use or retransfer them in ways that violate international
norms and values and harm U.S. interests.
China's engagement in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping operations
is a positive contribution to global security. However, Beijing's
continuing arms sales and military support to rogue regimes, namely Sudan,
Burma, and Iran, threaten the stability of fragile regions and hinder U.S.
and international efforts to address international crises, such as the
genocide in Darfur.
The U.S.' ability to promote its foreign policies around the world
and to protect its interests may be challenged by rising Chinese
influence.
Holding China accountable for fulfilling its international
commitments and encouraging it to adopt a constructive global role will
strengthen the international system.
Taiwan
The United States has an important interest in ensuring the
survival of a democratic government in Taiwan. The United States has
explicit commitments set forth in the Taiwan Relations Act to assist
Taiwan with its own defense.
While relations between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China
(PRC) have improved over the past year, tensions remain, and unresolved
issues regarding Taiwan's sovereignty and status continue to divide the
two sides. The status of Taiwan creates a potentially dangerous situation
that risks armed conflict if the relationship and its inherent tensions
are not managed carefully by both sides.
An armed conflict between the PRC and Taiwan would impair security,
stability, and prosperity in East Asia and could involve the United
States. It is in the interest of the United States to foster a peaceful
resolution of Taiwan's international status and maintenance of a peaceful
status quo until that resolution can be achieved.
The successful peaceful change of government between rival parties
in Taiwan during 2008 demonstrates the continuing maturation and
stabilization of Taiwan's youthful democratic process.
Taiwan's political discourse remains vibrant and strong, with
pronounced policy differences between Taiwan's major political parties
regarding economic ties with mainland China and the best means to provide
for Taiwan's prosperity and security. Taiwan's new government has
introduced significant shifts in economic and diplomatic policy that
emphasize seeking improved relations and liberalized economic ties with
mainland China while also seeking improved relations with the United
States.
Officials of Taiwan's government have indicated that they will
follow a pragmatic policy of seeking membership in international
organizations that do not require internationally recognized status as a
state as a prerequisite for membership, and official observer status or
other avenues for meaningful participation in international organizations
that require statehood for membership.
Officials in the Ma Administration have described a new defense
policy that deemphasizes deterrent or power projection options directed
against the mainland and instead relies on a more conventional defense
strategy based on defensive weapon systems.
Arms purchases from the United States are a keystone of Taiwan's
plans for its future defensive forces, and those plans cannot be realized
if the United States does not supply the weapon systems sought by Taiwan.
No other country has been willing to sell arms to Taiwan in the recent
past.
Japan's Relationship with China
The United States and Japan share similar concerns about China's
commitments under the World Trade Organization, its increasing pollution,
its failure to protect intellectual property, the safety of Chinese food
and other imports, and the security of the supply chain of each country's
defense industrial base.
Japan and China have several territorial disputes, one of which is
about the proper demarcation for their Exclusive Economic Zones in the
East China Sea. Although these disputes have not been resolved, the two
countries have found a temporary compromise in one case by agreeing to the
joint development of the East China Sea's oil reserves.
Japan plans to pursue a five-year buildup of the Japanese
Self-Defense Forces that is designed to enable it to respond effectively
to conflict scenarios near Japan, some of which could involve China.
The Republic of Korea's Relationship with China
The United States continues to be a close ally of the Republic of
Korea, even as South Korea seeks to strengthen and is strengthening
economic and diplomatic relations with China. South Korea views the United
States as a stabilizing presence in the region and sees the United States
as continuing to play an important role, even if Korean reunification were
to occur. In this vein, there appears to be a strong desire by South
Koreans for the U.S. government to retain its military forces there.
Republic of Korea-China trade continues to grow. South Korea
believes that expanded trade with China is essential to its economic
future. At the same time, many South Koreans fear the loss of their
technologies to China and consequent loss of commercial leadership.
North Korea is the Republic of Korea's largest security concern.
The concern includes North Korea's nuclear capability, its missiles, and
anarchy resulting from possible regime collapse.
Hong Kong
The United States maintains a keen interest in the development of
democracy in Hong Kong and adherence to the ''one country, two systems''
principle permitting that development. The Commission remains concerned
about China's willingness to honor its commitment to establishing
universal suffrage in Hong Kong. Electoral reforms in Hong Kong that fall
short of universal suffrage will damage confidence in the implementation
of the ''one country, two systems'' principle.
China's denial of entry to ships visiting Hong Kong is of great
concern to the United States, especially when such denials are based on
reactions to the internal policies of the United States. Denial of
permission to a ship to enter Hong Kong harbor is even more disturbing
when the ship is seeking safe harbor during a severe storm.
Hong Kong immigration officials' refusal of entry for Chinese and
American citizens during Olympic events suggests that a supposedly
independent entry process has been influenced and politicized by the PRC
government. Furthermore, Beijing's restrictions on visas for entry into
China by American businesspeople living in Hong Kong placed stress on the
business environment before and during the Olympics and hindered the
growth of new business opportunities.
China's Media and Information Controls-The
Impact in China and the United States
In the lead-up to the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, the
Chinese government made extensive promises of both greater media openness
and increased information access through the Internet. It kept some but
not all of these pledges. There were limited improvements for foreign
journalists, such as relaxations on travel restrictions. But the
government's anxieties regarding ''social stability'' during this
high-profile period led to increased surveillance of foreign journalists
and other visitors, notably including intensified Internet monitoring
conducted by China's security forces.
For China's own citizens, this year saw no significant
improvement in media freedom or access to information. Instead, during the
Olympics period, the government increased controls over the media and
access to information. The Chinese government continues to control media
outlets through direct censorship and determination or approval of
personnel appointments in the media, educational, and cultural sectors,
and it suppresses information that may be contrary to the preferred
narratives of the ruling Communist Party. The government also uses its
control of information to stoke Chinese nationalism and resentment of the
United States in a manner harmful to productive relations between the two
countries.
Conclusions
The Chinese government has created an information control regime
intended to regulate nearly every venue that might transmit information to
China's citizens: the print and broadcast media, the Internet, popular
entertainment, cultural activities, and education.
The Central Propaganda Department and its subordinate regional
bodies exercise extensive authority over the hiring and firing of
personnel in the media, educational, and entertainment sectors.
Personnel working in the media, educational, and cultural fields
have been conditioned into self-censorship by the rewards and punishments
of China's information control system and also face possible fines,
demotion, termination of employment, and even prison for publishing
information contrary to the party's preferred narratives.
The Chinese government did not fully honor promises of greater
media freedom that it made in conjunction with its bid to host the 2008
Olympic Games. Those promises now appear to have been tactical moves
intended to smooth the way for the games rather than serious statements of
policy intent. There were limited improvements in the latitude granted to
foreign journalists, particularly in terms of travel rights within the
country. However, many western journalists, particularly those from the
United States and the United Kingdom, remained subject to government
scrutiny and to opaque regulations restricting their activities.
The Chinese government has established an extensive physical
infrastructure to screen and monitor information on the Internet. An
Internet police force of large but indeterminate size monitors and censors
information on the Internet.
The propaganda system's central purpose is to perpetuate the
political authority of the Chinese Communist Party by concealing negative
information about the party and its history and by propagating narratives
intended to bolster the party's authoritarian rule. The propaganda system
also actively seeks to inflame Chinese nationalism in order to co-opt
nationalist sentiment as a means of legitimizing the party's authority.
The U.S. government takes the position that current Chinese
government regulations requiring all financial services companies to
operate through a subsidiary of the Xinhua news agency, and similar
regulations that make a Xinhua subsidiary a regulator of all financial
services information, violate China's signatory commitments to the WTO.
China's Compliance with Agreements Pertaining to
its Export to the United States of Prison Labor Products
The Commission examined the issue of prison labor imports
from China and found that the Chinese government has not complied with its
commitments under two formal agreements with the United States to
cooperate with U.S. officials to stop the export to the United States of
goods manufactured by prison or other forced labor in China. Under U.S.
law, it is illegal to import into the United States products made with
prison or other forced labor. Under two China-U.S. agreements signed in
the early 1990s, the Chinese government agreed to facilitate
investigations by U.S. officials of allegations of goods produced by
prison labor, including allowing U.S. officials to visit suspect
facilities. For several years, the Chinese government has not complied
with these provisions, making it impossible for U.S. officials to conduct
complete and useful investigations of such allegations. This has produced
a perverse set of incentives for law-abiding U.S. importers, who may find
themselves at a competitive disadvantage to competitors who obtain
merchandise made by Chinese prison labor.
Conclusions
The Chinese government has not complied with its commitments under
the 1992 Memorandum of Understanding and the supplementary 1994 Statement
of Cooperation with the United States related to prison labor exports to
the United States. It particularly has failed to comply with the
requirement that it grant permission for U.S. authorities to visit suspect
prison labor sites within 60 days of receipt of a U.S. request to do so.
Consequently, these agreements have been ineffective in enabling the U.S.
government to ensure that Chinese prison labor products are not imported
into the United States.
The official PRC position that ''reeducation through labor''
represents an administrative sanction rather than a form of prison
incarceration, and that it therefore is not covered by prison labor
agreements, leaves a large portion of the Chinese penal system outside the
scope of the prison labor agreements between the U.S. and Chinese
governments. The U.S. government does not agree with the Chinese
government's characterization of ''reeducation through labor'' as distinct
from prison incarceration. The Chinese government's refusal to include
''reeducation through labor'' facilities in the scope of prison labor
agreements eliminates any realistic possibility that the United States
reliably can identify sources of goods manufactured with prison labor and
prevent their importation into the United States.
The import of prison labor goods into the United States is illegal.
Although it is likely that prison labor products represent only a small
fraction of Chinese-manufactured products imported into the United States,
the preponderance of evidence suggests that Chinese prison-made goods
continue to enter the U.S. market.
The current failure effectively to enforce U.S. law prohibiting
importation of prison labor products has established a perverse set of
incentives for U.S. importers and their retail partners in which those
willing to purchase prison labor products from Chinese suppliers may
achieve and retain with impunity a competitive advantage over competitors
who source from legitimate manufacturers.
U.S. businesses that have cause to believe a competitor may be
importing products manufactured with prison or other forced labor, thereby
gaining an unfair competitive pricing advantage, currently have no private
right of action to pursue civil claims against that competitor.
THE COMMISSION'S KEY RECOMMENDATIONS
The Commission believes that 10 of its 45 recommendations to
Congress are of particular significance. These are presented below in the
order in which they appear in the Report. The complete list of 45
recommendations appears at the Report's conclusion on page 337.
Employing World Trade Organization trade remedies more
aggressively. The Commission recommends that Congress urge the
administration to employ more aggressively all trade remedies authorized
by World Trade Organization rules to counteract the Chinese government's
practices. The Commission further recommends that Congress urge the
administration to ensure that U.S. trade remedy laws are preserved and
effectively implemented to respond to China's unfair or predatory trade
activities so as to advance the interests of U.S. businesses.
Responding effectively to China's currency manipulation. The
Commission recommends that Congress enact legislation that will ensure an
effective response to China's currency manipulation.
Ensuring disclosure of foreign state-controlled investments in the
United States. The Commission recommends that Congress, within the context
of its broader review of financial and corporate regulation, create
enforceable disclosure requirements regarding the investments in the
United States of all foreign sovereign wealth funds and other foreign
state-controlled companies and investment vehicles. Such disclosure
requirements, embodied in law or regulation, should include but not be
limited to holdings in any public or private company, hedge fund, private
equity fund, investment partnership, and/or investment vehicle.
Monitoring reviews of foreign state-controlled investments in the
United States. The Commission recommends that Congress monitor the
implementation and application of the Foreign Investment and National
Security Act of 2007 and other appropriate laws and regulations with
respect to the possibility of China's sovereign wealth funds acting in
concert with other Chinese government-controlled companies and/or
investment vehicles in a manner that technically fails to activate the
established review process.
Identifying substandard shipments of imported fish into the United
States. The Commission recommends that Congress grant the authority to the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to identify and indelibly mark imports
of fish that fail to meet the agency's standards of safety and to seize
and destroy shipments of fish that foreign governments report have been
contaminated or that subsequently are recalled in that country. The
Commission further recommends that Congress pass legislation to institute
within the FDA an import inspection and equivalency of standards program
for fish similar to the meat and poultry inspection program administered
by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Examining the implications of China's use of media manipulation and
''lawfare'' for U.S. foreign policy and military activities. The
Commission recommends that Congress direct the U.S. departments of State
and Defense to examine the implications of China's use of media
manipulation and ''lawfare'' for U.S. foreign policy and military
activities.
Ensuring adequate funding for programs to monitor and protect
critical American computer networks and sensitive information. The
Commission recommends that Congress assess the adequacy of and, if needed,
provide additional funding for military, intelligence, and homeland
security programs that monitor and protect critical American computer
networks and sensitive information, specifically those tasked with
protecting networks from damage caused by cyber attacks.
Assessing the security and integrity of the supply chain for
government and defense contractor computer equipment, and ensuring
acquisition of equipment from trustworthy sources. In order to maintain
the security of computer networks used by U.S. government agencies and
defense contractors, the Commission recommends that Congress assess the
security and integrity of the supply chain for computer equipment employed
in those government and contractor networks-particularly those used by the
Department of Defense-and, if necessary, provide additional funding to
ensure the acquisition of equipment from trustworthy sources.
Pressing China to reduce tariffs on environmental goods and
services. The Commission recommends that Congress urge the administration
to press China to reduce or eliminate in a timely fashion its tariffs on
environmental goods and services so as to encourage the import of clean
energy and pollution control technologies into China.
Establishing a ''private right of action'' against those suspected
of importing products of prison labor. The Commission recommends that
Congress enact legislation establishing a ''private right of
action''-i.e., civil litigation-allowing a business to file suit against a
competitor suspected of importing prison labor products in violation of
U.S. law and/or knowingly falsifying customs information in order to gain
an unfair competitive
advantage.